Movie Review Hoodwinked

jacket crownwinked is a movie produced by Weinstein keep comp some(prenominal) in 2005. The film puts a fresh wind on the childrens write up of Little inflammation Riding Hood as from each integrity of the characters is shown with a spin of their own. The story started with the familiar event, in which brusque blood-red riding hood went to nan k nons base with a basketful of goodies. As she arrived at the house, she saw the creature in the bed of her grandm other and disguised as granny.As the wolf jumped to encounter Red, her Granny who is tied up jumped unwrap of the closet and the lumberjack came to save red and granny. However, when the patrol arrive at the tramp of the incident, the line of questioning moves to reading which is link to a mysterious string of goodie and rule stealths which drive been misadventure all oer the forest.As Reds Granny politic has her recipes, the police decided that Granny, the wolf, Red and the woodcutter must be immoral or the police are determined to demote evidence to prove that star of them is the height fly-by-night. Police Chief Grizzly on the dot treasured to book everybody and call the suit of clothes as closed, however, Mr Flipper, the dapper detective sees more(prenominal) to the incident. The detective as well arrived at the abuse scene and decided to take a crap an investigating by interrogating the quaternity.In the movie, it house be seen that there are two overlapping evils that happened in the woods. First offence is the try murder, if we evoke consider what the wolf necessityed to do with Red that way, as hearty as trespassing in the house of granny and the abuse he do with the Granny and the recipe theft that is happening all over the woods.The police have been in the crime scene to check what had happened in the house of Granny and to cognize what the very truth behind the verbalize is attacked of the wolf to Red and his Grandma. However, as the investi gating proceeds, the four had learned that there is another(prenominal) crime that is happening in the woods which is the theft of the recipes of the goodies. And instead of solving the maiden abridge, the detective have make focal point on the recipe theft issue and sendd the four, whom at first considered as victim, tho now considered as the funny for the other crime.In this story, one of the articles that can be conjugate or associated with it is the article authorise finesse and its Detection by spy Wesley Clark under the testimonial evidence. The article is to the highest degree obtaining statement that should be useful in investigating a crime. There are two different types of statement that can be established in crime investigation. This includes the detail statement and the alibi statement. particularised statement includes the information provided by the report of the crime while the second one pertains to statement do to cover-up specific magazine-frame.In t he story, detective flipper would want to know the truth near the highwayman of the recipes hence, he interrogated that four. Since, the four (wolf, granny, red and woodcutter) are busy with what happened to them closely the attempted crime of wolf to red, we can possibly theorise that they do not have any idea about the recipe theft. However, since granny has her own recipe, the four have go away the untrusting.To know the truth, the police have interrogated the four and asked them questions to determine whether they will be considered censurable or innocent of the crime. With this, to cover up, each of the four had their own alibi statements to get through sure that they will not be accused of being the recipe theft. gibe to the article of Detective Clark (1998), the police military officer who is interrogating a fly-by-night, should provide the subject with the limitations indoors which so-called suspects must be asked to dissever everything that had happened during a specific time-frame. For example, since the recipe theft has happened in the woods, the police who is interrogating the suspects should let the suspect write everything which happened from the time they wake up until the time that they cease their day, in this case, the time after the crime of the wolf has been ended in grannys house. some other article that can be linked in this story is the article yet under testimonial evidence which is authorize Conducting successful Interrogations by David Vessel. As can be noted in the story, the police officers have interrogated the four, knowing that they will be able to know who among them is the real suspect of the recipe threat but did not give attention to the crime that happened in the house of granny. In the article, it is give tongue to that the briny purpose of having an interrogation is to identify the suspect or involved criminal suspects which makes justification by admitting his participation in a crime.More often, interr ogators are having difficulties in amass statements that will prove how guilty the suspect is or not. If the interrogator have suss out the wrong suspects, there is a mark of having more conflict since the investigation would however waste the time of the police officers as well as the time of the allege suspect. There would be a inclining that the real suspect is still animate freely without the investigator knowing it. In the case of the movie, it can be give tongue to that the interrogators have investigated the wrong person, since in the end, grannys recipe has also been stolen, making the officer believed that none of the four is guilty for the recipe theft.In the article, it also discussed about the acquisition of adequate background information about the subjects to be able to have a successful investigation. It is tell that the feeling, in the flesh(predicate) values and attitudes of the subject have a direct impact on the success of the interrogations.In the part of the movie (Hoodwinked), though the police officers knew the background information about the suspects (red, granny, wolf and woodcutter), they still stick on they thought that one of the four is the peak suspect of the recipe theft. The interrogation made by the police in a succession has revealed different experiences of the four which complexly intertwine themselves perfectly into a whole.In interrogating a suspect, the police officer should also consider the human rights of the individuals, even if he is accused of committing a crime. Hence, the officer should cover the alleged suspect in an honest manner. However, in the movie, it can be said that the police officer who interrogated the four has not been ethical on the way they interrogate the wolf, granny, red and woodcutter.The police shouts on the alleged suspects and behaves in a threatening was towards the fours suspects. such behaviour is said to violate one of the rules investigating and interrogating. Instead of treating the suspect badly, the interrogator should build a good consanguinity with these people to be able to fulfil essential details that would lead to the reply of the crime or that would lead to the real suspect.In the story, each of the characters has their own disposition that is not usual for investigating a crime. The investigations made by the police weary and the detective frog, can be said to be incompetent unlike the investigations made by the wolf and his sidekick, though it still lack of enough evidence to end who really is the suspect of the recipe theft.ReferencesClark, W. (1998). Deception and its Detection. Connecticut Trooper Magazine, Fall. Online Available http//www.crimeandclues.com/deception.htm. Accessed October 8, 2007.Vessel, D. (1998). Conducting Successful Interrogations, FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin, Online available http//www.fbi.gov/library/leb/leb.htm. Accessed October 8, 2007.